Saturday, August 22, 2020
Business Past Paper Essay
E of the accompanying points and compose it in the space gave. (I) ââ¬ËThe changing job of ladies in the familyââ¬â¢ (ii) ââ¬ËThe contribution of youngsters in sorted out sportsââ¬â¢ Topic:_ _ _ _ _ 1. (a) State TWO reasons why an analyst would examine the point which you have expressed previously. (2 imprints) (b) Suggest ONE target on which a scientist may concentrate in doing an examination on the point you picked. (2 imprints) (c) Based on the target you proposed in 1 (b), think of ONE research question. (2 imprints) (d) State ONE fitting strategy that might be utilized to gather information on the point you picked. (1 imprint) (e) Outline why a scientist should utilize the strategy you expressed in 1 (d) above. (2 imprints) Total 9 imprints 2. (a) For the subject you have picked, propose TWO factors which a scientist may examine. (2 imprints) (b) Identify TWO gatherings from which a scientist may choose an example to get data on the theme you picked. (2 imprints) (c) State ONE technique for picking an example from ONE of the gatherings you distinguished in 2 (b) above. (1 imprint) (d) Briefly portray the technique you proposed in 2 (c). (2 imprints) Total 7 imprints 3. (a) Suggest TWO different ways to show the information that might be gathered on the subject you pick. (2 imprints) (b) Explain quickly why the information ought to be shown in the manners you proposed in 3 (a). (2 imprints) (c) Name TWO factual estimates that a specialist may use to decide how numerical information, for example, scores acquired in an investigation, are connected. (2 imprints) All out 6 imprints Utilize the data in the entry beneath to respond to addresses 4 and 5. Liquor AND FAMILY LIFE In an ongoing report done on the impacts of liquor on family life, the heads of fifty (50) low pay families reacted. The accompanying data was gotten and broke down. 30% of the respondents expressed that liquor utilization denies a few families from fulfilling their fundamental needs, 60% demonstrated that it is a reason for abusive behavior at home in the home while 10% guaranteed that it kept relatives from getting a charge out of arranged recreation exercises. These discoveries have caused worry for some, local gatherings. Pioneers of these gatherings want to discover a few answers for these worries from the neighborhood experts in their networks. 4. (an) (I) Display the discoveries acquired in this study in a pie-diagram in the space gave beneath. (4 imprints) (ii) Write ONE explanation about the information you showed in the pie-chart. (2 imprints) (b) State ONE trait of the example utilized in this study. (1 imprint) (c) Name ONE research technique that the specialist may have used to gather data. (1 imprint) (d) Write ONE inquiry that might be remembered for the examination technique you named in 4 (c). (1 imprint) Total 9 imprints 5. (a) Based on the information gave in the overview, think of ONE research question. (2 imprints) (b) Based on the discoveries you showed in 4 (an) (I), propose ONE suggestion that might be useful to the network heads. (1 imprint) (c) State ONE change you would make on the off chance that you were approached to direct the investigation. (1 imprint) Total 4 imprints
Friday, August 21, 2020
Tarnished gold Some of the great Olympics cheat Essays - Sports
Discolored gold: Some of the 'incomparable' Olympics swindles Quicker, higher, farther...sneakier? From non-crippled Paralympians to fixed fencing foils and badminton players expectation on losing - here's our manual for the Olympians who missed the mark concerning the high Olympic goals... Fellow Adams @ guyadams Wednesday 1 August 2012 11:00 BST Discolored gold: Some of the 'incomparable' Olympics swindles An authority compromises Greysia Polii and Meiliana Jauhari of Indonesia and Jung Eun Ha and Min Jung Kim of Korea with a 'dark card' exclusion In the long history of Olympic deceiving the previous evening's exertion (or rather absence of it) by badminton players at Wembley Arena is somewhat surprising. Instead of endeavoring to win through the utilizing of insidious techniques the players from China and South Korea, truth be told, seemed, by all accounts, to be endeavoring to lose so as to control a draw. The ridiculous scenes that saw players booed, sneered, precluded and afterward reestablished - have today prompted the starting of disciplinary procedures against the four players. The disaster started when Chinese top seeds Wang Xiaoli and Yu Yang began to show little enthusiasm for beating Koreans Jung Kyung-eun and Kim Ha-na to complete top of Group A. Coming next would have implied maintaining a strategic distance from comrades and second seeds Tian Qing and Zhao Yunlei in any event until the last. Tian and Zhao had been sent off their characteristic way to the last as second seeds by destruction to Denmark's Kamilla Rytter Juhl and Christinna Pedersen prior in the day. The Koreans reacted to China's jokes by duplicating them and ref Thorsten Berg developed to caution all the players and along these lines exclude and restore them. In spite of the fact that the longing to lose may have been strange, deception, control and inside and out cheating at the Olympic games are the same old thing... Ben Johnson, Seoul, 1988 There were sedate cheats previously, and there have been medicate cheats since. Be that as it may, it took the ruin of Ben Johnson to show the obvious pervasiveness of restricted substances at the most elevated level of game. On the night of 24 September, the Canadian runner set another world record of 9.79 seconds in the men's 100m last, lifting his turn in triumph as he crossed the end goal in front of most outstanding opponent Carl Lewis and Britain's Linford Christie, in what a BBC observer announced the best run race ever. After three days, it turned into the most discolored. Johnson was deprived of his award, and had his record canceled after an example of his pee tried positive for stanozolol , an unlawful steroid. He at first denied cheating, yet later admitted - contending that medication utilize was endemic in top-level sports. As it were, he had a point: six of the eight finalists in that well known 100m race were sooner or later in their vocations polluted by relationship with squeezing, and a few, similar to him, served bans. In any case, nobody fell further, or harder, or more openly than Ben Johnson. What's more, some way or another, the Olympic perfect could never feel a remarkable same. Boris Onischenko , Montreal, 1976 At the tallness of the Cold War, when Olympic games were a figure for political conflicts among East and West, the vigorously preferred Russians took on second-top picks , Great Britain, in the fencing leg of the Modern Pentathlon. Onischenko , who had won silver in the past two Games, and was frantic to go one better, effortlessly dispatched the UK's Danny Parker. At that point he won a puzzling session against Adrian Parker, wherein the electronic scoreboard enrolled a hit, in spite of an evident absence of contact between Onischenko's epee and Parker's body. Next up was Jim Fox, a British Army chief. From the get-go in their session, the scoreboard again lit up, proposing a Soviet triumph. Be that as it may, Fox, who was certain he'd made sly move, was having none of it - and requested an assessment of his adversary's blade. I thought the weapon was defective, he later reviewed. That was just its half. Covered underneath the calfskin handle, makes a decision about found a many-sided wiring framework intended to enroll a hit when a little catch was squeezed. It was a genuine designing activity, said Mike Proudfoot , the British group chief. Not only a ham beginner's exertion. They had
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)